birth pangs
You are currently browsing articles tagged birth pangs.
Read an Excerpt of Spero
"Spero is an imaginative fantasy that subtly instructs, entertains, and intellectually provokes the reader. It is fascinating reading. I'm definitely hooked on this series." Jean Heimann at Catholic Fire.
"...intelligent as well as inspiring..." Terry Barga at whattodoabout.com.
Please visit www.birthpangs.com/cart to buy Spero
(and Fidelis) from the author or to buy from Amazon.com
Fidelis, my first book, is Latin for faithfulness. The second book,
Spero, is Latin for hope. Spero is an exploration of what hope is and why we need it. It is an exploration of what things are good to put our hope in and what things are bad to put our hope in. In the fictionalized America of the future portrayed in the Birth Pangs series, all of the things that people have traditionally put their hope in have been brought low. There are no government agencies, no schools, and not even churches. In the face of daily perils, people have to figure out how where they are going to place their hope.
It is interesting to me that the political candidate running on 'hope' is also running on 'change.' I think this illustrates the root of the problem. The best place to put your 'hope' is where it won't shift beneath your feet. Also, we need to be clear about what things we hope to overcome. Nearly all of our systems and institutions are geared to address certain day to day realities that are important but not, I'm afraid, ultimate. There is one problem that surpasses them all: death.
Spero is about people- even good people- putting their hope in lesser means to tackle lesser problems and being confronted with the consequences of that approach.
Spero is about being confronted with our chief problem and challenged to consider what possible solutions there might be to that problem... and whether any of these are within our control, or obtainable by our own effort.
This is a continuation of an interview done originally by audio. That audio is lost, so I am responding in text. This is question 9:
It is clear in your writing that you go to great lengths to develop masculine men and feminine women, yet you go to great pains to make your masculine men not macho, and your feminine women not submissive or needy in the least, while remaining very feminine. What draws you to explore these issues of masculinity and femininity?
I suppose there are two aspects of this question. What draws me to explore these issues and how did this get reflected in the presentation of men and women?
The ‘draw’ is easy enough. In my own life I felt that there were a missing components of ‘masculinity’ in my own life, like I was meant for something quite different- as a man- but for one reason or another I was not acting like a full man. If there is a ‘masculine ideal’ I wasn’t measuring up. There seemed to be others who felt the same way, even if their conclusions were different. The extraordinary success of Elridge’s “Wild at Heart” I think illustrates this. I don’t think that only men feel this disconnect, either.
At any rate, it seemed to me as I tried to find a way to resolve this issue that the very structure of our lives de-masculinizes and de-feminizes us. Read the rest of this entry »
I posted a section for the posting of errata and we certainly could have posted quite a bit. However, in anticipation of the re-release of book one in hard cover, I had the text scoured by yet another individual. There may be some flaws that remain here and there, but hopefully these won’t be weird spell check errors or odd grammar formulations. I kept away from any kind of revision that seriously might affect the version itself. Not only have I set the text for the hard cover, but I have arranged for the soft cover to have the new text, as well. I don’t mean the illustrations and other nice features of the hard cover, just the text itself. So, all future copies of the soft cover are cleaned up. There was one very glaring error that was a bit embarrassing indeed, and I’m glad it is now eradicated.
